DekaCrimson
Global Moderator
*Original Screencapper*
Posts: 285
|
Post by DekaCrimson on Apr 23, 2006 1:40:59 GMT -5
Everyone knows my feelings towards the staffing of RT, particularly the higher ups. Since, I am retired, I have made a vow to myself to severely limit my activity on RT to just 5 threads or so at the most. Nonetheless, I saw this excellent post by JM www.rangertalk.com/showthread.php?t=7509&page=2And I just had to make a thread here to give him kudos for it! I've been doing things like this for the longest time and I am pretty sure that its what got the administration on my ass to make a conspiracy to demod me. Eitherway, the points made in this post of JM's are straightforward and I hope that it inspires more members at RT to speak up. Good job JM. You know you have my support if you need it!
|
|
Zero
Moderator
Bakuryuu Change
Posts: 363
|
Post by Zero on Apr 23, 2006 1:46:09 GMT -5
Ah, so this is what the PM he sent was about... nice thing, I´m not that friendly with the RT staff too, but I don´t want trouble so I don´t say anything around there, but here isn´t around there...
|
|
Tazz Davis
Administrator
The Greatest Jedi Knight. .
Red Stealth Ranger
Posts: 913
|
Post by Tazz Davis on Apr 23, 2006 1:47:16 GMT -5
i apriciate that DC i feel that Mike in preticular is the one that needs to address those issues and only he can change the way people there feel...I also feel that he needs to cut the staff loose there and start over...maybe it will make the board feel like a community again.
while this thread is important and i know that my comments are justified i feel that this will cause others to not want to join.
moved thread to junkyard
|
|
Tazz Davis
Administrator
The Greatest Jedi Knight. .
Red Stealth Ranger
Posts: 913
|
Post by Tazz Davis on Apr 23, 2006 2:36:03 GMT -5
and if anyone is wondering if that got me banned or not....NO it just got me a 10% warn and i think it was accually for the last comment i made. ;D
|
|
DekaCrimson
Global Moderator
*Original Screencapper*
Posts: 285
|
Post by DekaCrimson on Apr 23, 2006 12:28:49 GMT -5
Yeah, I think that new mod on the block statement definitely stung. Nice touch. You know if I were still a mod or not retired, I'd definitely be in that thread backing you up. I remember that there was one point where I was trying to get the rest of the staff to drop their signatures just so everyone could be equal.
Anyways, I'm proud of you JM. So does this mean you are banned from RT? Since thats what it says under your username..
|
|
Tazz Davis
Administrator
The Greatest Jedi Knight. .
Red Stealth Ranger
Posts: 913
|
Post by Tazz Davis on Apr 23, 2006 14:00:34 GMT -5
yeap for 2 days for stiring up unnessasary troubl
|
|
DekaCrimson
Global Moderator
*Original Screencapper*
Posts: 285
|
Post by DekaCrimson on Apr 23, 2006 20:30:36 GMT -5
Hmm, thats a lame reason. Then how is "necessary" trouble labeled?
|
|
Tazz Davis
Administrator
The Greatest Jedi Knight. .
Red Stealth Ranger
Posts: 913
|
Post by Tazz Davis on Apr 23, 2006 23:45:11 GMT -5
lol true...it seems that my last comments did it. I dought i will be going back and i have an idea to really make them wish they didnt do it...but im not going to say anymore here on that
|
|
Tazz Davis
Administrator
The Greatest Jedi Knight. .
Red Stealth Ranger
Posts: 913
|
Post by Tazz Davis on Apr 26, 2006 15:32:41 GMT -5
ok i just had to say this...while i think rangertalk was a little on the harsh side i just had a long pm session with MIKE on AIM. He told me that what i said was very well thought out and very truethful. He also told me that he really payed attention to what i said and now that jedixtalk.com is up there are some major diffrences. i hope that it doesnt get as bad as rangertalk.com...for now i will continue to post there.
update. while sigs are currently still avilble for staff they will be removed soon...Mike says he hates sigs and that he does not truely want them on his board,
personally i like sigs..its an easy way to advertise your site. but hey its his board. I am also happy to see a much smaller staff and the removal of one preticular staff member.
|
|